US drone strikes resume in Pakistan

The Washington Post  reported today (Feb 21st) that out of 118 CIA drone strikes in Pakistan only 13 ‘High Value Targets’ had been killed, of which only two were on the US’ Most Wanted list.  According to the New American Foundation it is estimated that a total of 607 people were killed in US drones strikes in Pakistan in 2010.  Interestingly the Post report also states that each drone strike in Pakistan costs the CIA £1m!    

The press report comes as two separate drone strikes in Pakistan reportedly killed eleven people .  These are the first drone strikes in Pakistan in almost a month, a gap which many attribute to the US attempts to free Raymond Davis, an alleged CIA spy accused of killing two men in Lahore in mid-January.    For more about the Davis case see this report from the Guardian.

The ‘DC Exile’ blog has some interesting reflections on the legality of US drone strikes following last week’s Newsweek interview with the former CIA counsel , John Rizzo, who authorised drone strikes in Pakistan.   They suggest that the revelation that once identified, a targeted individual may be subject to the use of force at any time thereafter calls into question one of the US stated legal justification for drone strikes:

“such continuous targetability calls into question the ability of the United States to rely on self-defense as one of its two legal justifications for its targeted killing program. Strikes against these continuously targetable individuals would then only be lawful within the context of an armed conflict. Any targeted killing outside of an armed conflict or valid self-defense would be an illegal, extrajudicial execution.”

It’s well worth reading the whole post.

Meanwhile Radio One’s ‘Newsbeat’ programme secured an interview with 15 year old Sadaullah Wazir who lost both his legs and an eye in US drone strike in North Waziristan (as well as members of his family).  He is currently attempting to sue the CIA.  You can see short video of the interview here

In Afghanistan NATO have launched an investigation  after the Governor of Konar province said 65 people including 22 women and more than 30 children were killed in a NATO operation.  Most reports suggest the attacks were carried out by NATO helicopters but the Washington Post says a Predator drone was also involved

PS…..    Drone Wars UK – Mini Tour

I’m doing a few speaking gigs over the next few weeks on drones – do come along if you are in the area.

Sun 27th Feb,  7pm         Porthmadog FoR – Y Ganolfan, Porthmadog  :  Details here

Mon 28th Feb, 7.30pm    Caermarfon FoR  – vestry of Salem chapel, Caernarfon:  Details here

Tues 1st Mar:  7.30pm   Oxford Stop the War – Town Hall, Oxford:  Details here

Mon 14th Mar:  8pm –  Friends Meeting House, Queens Road Leicester CND AGM

Thur 14th Apr: 7.30pm – Public Meeting, Friends Meeting House, Bristol

Sat 14th May, 2pm – FoR Scotland Annual Conference

BBC research into drone strikes in Pakistan

BBC Urdu has published new research into the undeclared war in Pakistan.  They report that since January 2009 nearly 2,500 people have been killed in Pakistan as a result of US drones and Islamic militant attacks.  They attribute 746 deaths to US drone strikes (30%) and 1,713 deaths (70%) to Islamic militant attacks.

What will hit the headlines though is the fact that in response a Taleban spokesman, Muhammed Umer, has said that “In the short term, yes, you can say it [drone strikes] has caused us some difficulties because of the martyrdoms and realignment of our ranks.”   The Guardian have already reported the story as ‘Taliban says US drone attacks ‘temporarily’ hindering insurgency’.     What Muhammed Umer goes on to say – and probably won’t get so much coverage – is that the drone strikes are also bringing new volunteers and recruits.

A unnamed ‘senior US official’ is also quoted in the report as saying that since Obama has taken office, 650 militants and 20 non-combatants have been killed by drone strikes.   Tactfully the BBC say

“Research by the BBC’s Urdu service puts the number of those killed considerably higher, and says there have been many cases where there has been no positive identification of those killed at all”. 

While the CIA, as usual refused to comment on their drone strikes, the same ‘unnamed senior US official’ said that drones are “the most precise weapons system in the history of warfare.”   No doubt as precise as his casualty figures.

BBC research into drone strikes in Pakistan

BBC Urdu has published new research into the undeclared war in Pakistan.  They report that since January 2009 nearly 2,500 people have been killed in Pakistan as a result of US drones and Islamic militant attacks.  They attribute 746 deaths to US drone strikes (30%) and 1,713 deaths (70%) to Islamic militant attacks.

What will hit the headlines though is the fact that in response a Taleban spokesman, Muhammed Umer, has said that “In the short term, yes, you can say it [drone strikes] has caused us some difficulties because of the martyrdoms and realignment of our ranks.”   The Guardian have already reported the story as ‘Taliban says US drone attacks ‘temporarily’ hindering insurgency’.     What Muhammed Umer goes on to say – and probably won’t get so much coverage – is that the drone strikes are also bringing new volunteers and recruits.

A unnamed ‘senior US official’ is also quoted in the report as saying that since Obama has taken office, 650 militants and 20 non-combatants have been killed by drone strikes.   Tactfully the BBC say

“Research by the BBC’s Urdu service puts the number of those killed considerably higher, and says there have been many cases where there has been no positive identification of those killed at all”. 

While the CIA, as usual refused to comment on their drone strikes, the same ‘unnamed senior US official’ said that drones are “the most precise weapons system in the history of warfare.”   No doubt as precise as his casualty figures.